Dutch military intelligence allegedly watched Jared Kushner’s iPhone screen in real time and saw money and Middle East moves unfold, according to a new book excerpt.
Story Snapshot
- A journalist reports Dutch spies accessed Kushner’s iPhone activity in early 2018.
- The alleged trail points to a Russian military-intelligence operative and server.
- Claims include logins to a United Arab Emirates-linked account and big-dollar transfers.
- Kushner and his lawyer call the story “completely insane” and deny any such accounts.
Alleged phone access traced through a Russian-linked server
Vanity Fair published an excerpt of reporter Matthew Cole’s forthcoming book that says Dutch military intelligence found screenshots of Jared Kushner’s iPhone on a server tied to a Russian military-intelligence figure. The account says Dutch specialists then exploited a flaw to observe Kushner’s phone screen in early 2018. The reporting places the access within a clear chain: a Russian operative, a Russian server with screenshots, and Dutch military intelligence as the observer.
The book excerpt frames the phone view as more than a technical feat. It says analysts watched sessions that touched live diplomacy and finance. The claim links observed activity to ongoing talks in the Middle East and to accounts apparently connected to the United Arab Emirates. The reporting does not treat it as a random hack or a rumor. It tracks specific actors, dates, and a method of access, which is what makes national-security professionals lean in when they read it.
What Dutch analysts allegedly saw on the screen
The excerpt says viewers watched Kushner log into a United Arab Emirates-linked account and saw communications referring to senior figures, including Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. ambassador David Friedman. The reporting describes at least $2 billion allegedly steered into accounts tied to Kushner, with about $750 million at First Abu Dhabi Bank and roughly $1 billion in Israel. The narrative also points to a charity account in the United Arab Emirates where Kushner allegedly had signatory power.
Secondary summaries push the money angle even harder. They highlight transfers described as reaching hundreds of millions and suggest links to shadow negotiations across the region. While those stories echo the book’s figures, they mainly repackage the same core claims rather than add new records. The numbers stand out because they go beyond vague words like “large” or “significant.” They give round sums and name institutions, which invites specific follow-up questions from investigators and readers alike.
The denials and the conservative lens on due process
Jared Kushner rejected the claims outright after the excerpt ran. He called them “completely insane, categorically false, and never happened.” His lawyer said “there are no accounts and never were.” He also faulted the reporting for not attaching bank statements, wire details, account numbers, or dates. Those denials meet a basic conservative test: extraordinary claims deserve concrete proof, and private citizens retain the right to challenge accusations and demand evidence before judgment.
A single caveat belongs here because it is squarely part of the reporting record: the published materials to date are an excerpt and derivative coverage; they do not include screenshots, device forensics, or bank records in public view. That said, the allegation’s specificity is why it matters. If correct, it suggests foreign intelligence watched a senior White House adviser handle accounts and messages linked to high-stakes diplomacy. If false, it underscores how easily untested claims can smear reputations and distract policymakers.
Why the claims, if accurate, would matter for U.S. policy
The story sits at the junction of phone security, foreign influence, and post-office money flows. The Senate Finance Committee has already probed Kushner’s foreign fundraising after government service, noting the heavy share of foreign capital in his firm’s assets. That thread does not prove the alleged phone activity, but it sets a clear policy risk: when vast sums from allied monarchies mingle with American power, conflicts of interest grow, and even friendly spy services may watch closely.
#IGR: A phone hack, secret accounts and an alleged billion-dollar money trail.
A Vanity Fair investigation raises questions about Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner’s financial links to the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Israel.
Dutch intelligence reportedly monitored his phone… pic.twitter.com/OiMRoujfFv
— India Global Review (@IGR_Media) October 23, 2026
Common-sense guardrails follow from that risk. Senior officials should keep strict device hygiene and avoid any commingling of public work with private accounts. Financial disclosures should be timely and transparent, especially when partners are foreign states. Lawmakers can tighten rules so that diplomacy and private capital do not share the same calendar. Those steps protect national interests, shield honest actors from rumor, and make any bad actor easier to spot in daylight.
Sources:
archive.is, vanityfair.com, newsweek.com, en.nuns.rs
© impactheadlines.com 2026. All rights reserved.
